View Details
Showing only entries that have "am ambivalent" selected for "I have used LITERATURE: THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE(Abcarian, Klotz, and Cohen) and I:" Show all entries

    I have used EMERGING: CONTEMPORARY READINGS FOR WRITERS (Barrios) and I I have used ACTING OUT CULTURE: READING AND WRITING (Miller) and I I have used READING OUR WORLD (Yagelski) and I I have used FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING (Greene and Lidinsky) and I I have used CHANGING SOCIETY (Schwab and Love) and I I have used MAKING LITERATURE MATTER (Schilb and Clifford) and I: I have used MAKING ARGUMENTS ABOUT LITERATURE (Schilb and Clifford) and I I have used LITERATURE: THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE(Abcarian, Klotz, and Cohen) and I: I have used THE NORTON INTRODUCTION TO LITERATURE, SHORTER 9TH EDITION (Booth, Hunter, and Mays) and I: I have used A WRITER'S REFERENCE (Hacker) and I: Do you think the custom A Writer's Reference is a useful text to require of all First Year Writing students (ENWR 100, 105, and 106)? Please offer text recommendations for any of the courses. Just make sure the recommendations fit our program. Thank you. Please add details for any text about which you feel strongly, listing its strengths and weaknesses. We are particularly interested to hear why you do not recommend a text or are ambivalent. Please mention the text by name in your response as your answer here is not linked to your answers on the rest of the survey.
4 delete 2011-03-30 12:05:41 am ambivalent
 recommend it
 am ambivalent
 recommend it
 am ambivalent
 recommend it
 recommend it
 am ambivalent
 don't recommend it
 recommend it
13 delete 2011-04-01 18:04:44 recommend it
 am ambivalent
 recommend it
 Yes
21 delete 2011-04-11 09:33:16 don't recommend it
 am ambivalent
 recommend it
 Ambivalent
22 delete 2011-04-11 13:26:39 am ambivalent
 am ambivalent
 am ambivalent
 recommend it
 Yes
 Many good readings in Making Arguments About Literature. The companion reference book offers compact interpretations and commentary. I like that the book is under 1000 pages. Would be nice if the book had a more logical sequence to its arrangement. As is, I find myself doing work that the editors could have done.