View Details |
I have used EMERGING: CONTEMPORARY READINGS FOR WRITERS (Barrios) and I | I have used ACTING OUT CULTURE: READING AND WRITING (Miller) and I | I have used READING OUR WORLD (Yagelski) and I | I have used FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING (Greene and Lidinsky) and I | I have used CHANGING SOCIETY (Schwab and Love) and I | I have used MAKING LITERATURE MATTER (Schilb and Clifford) and I: | I have used MAKING ARGUMENTS ABOUT LITERATURE (Schilb and Clifford) and I | I have used LITERATURE: THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE(Abcarian, Klotz, and Cohen) and I: | I have used THE NORTON INTRODUCTION TO LITERATURE, SHORTER 9TH EDITION (Booth, Hunter, and Mays) and I: | I have used A WRITER'S REFERENCE (Hacker) and I: | Do you think the custom A Writer's Reference is a useful text to require of all First Year Writing students (ENWR 100, 105, and 106)? | Please offer text recommendations for any of the courses. Just make sure the recommendations fit our program. Thank you. | Please add details for any text about which you feel strongly, listing its strengths and weaknesses. We are particularly interested to hear why you do not recommend a text or are ambivalent. Please mention the text by name in your response as your answer here is not linked to your answers on the rest of the survey. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 delete | 2011-03-30 12:02:00 | recommend it |
am ambivalent |
am ambivalent |
am ambivalent |
No |
I am ambivalent to A Writer's Reference because I do not feel it is necessary to have students purchase a text when there is reliable and solid information online. I am ambivalent to the Clifford and Schilb texts because Matter is too large for our purposes and Making Arguments has limited readings. | |||||||
24 delete | 2011-04-12 00:11:08 | recommend it |
don't recommend it |
am ambivalent |
No |
Making Literature Matter is expensive and its drama section is very very weak. There must be better texts out there than this one for our department. |